Homeschooling Logo

How infant-directed speech helps infants study

December 30, 2023
Homeschooling Blogs

Whether you think it’s cute, or it makes you squirm, “baby talk” is a compelling, scientific phenomenon. All around the world, people use a special register when they speak to the very young. This “infant-directed speech,” or IDS, is recognizable for its higher pitch, and more melodic, emotionally-charged tone.

These features capture a baby’s attention, and make it easier for him or her to grasp the emotional intentions of speech.

In fact, fascinating experiments show that adults listening to a foreign language were better able to pick up on a speaker’s emotions when he or she used infant-directed speech (Bryant and Barret 2007; Bryant et al 2012). You can read more about it in my article on the attention-getting and emotional functions of baby talk.

But what about language development? Does infant-directed speech help babies learn how to talk?

Infant-directed speech includes many modifications that seem tailor-made for the language learner. It’s slower, more repetitive, and more likely to exaggerate the pronunciation of vowels. In addition, people using IDS are more likely speak in shorter, simpler utterances. Experiments suggest that these modifications help babies develop several key abilities, including

  • the ability to discriminate between different speech sounds
  • the ability to detect the boundaries between words in a stream of speech
  • the ability to recognize distinct clauses in a stream of speech

It’s even possible that individual differences in the way that parents use baby talk could affect how quickly infants learn to speak.

So it seems that we have lots of reasons to forget our inhibitions and let loose with the baby talk. Here is the evidence.

Infant-directed speech may help babies tune into the sounds of their native language

When people use IDS, they may hyper-articulate vowel sounds — pronoucing them in more extreme ways, so that different vowel sounds contrast more strongly with each other (Marklund and Gustavsson 2020). Adults do the same thing when they talk to people with foreign accents (Uther et al 2007).

Does this exaggerated pronunciation make it easier for people to learn about speech sounds? If so, we might predict that the more a mother hyper-articulates, the better her infant should perform on tests of speech perception.

Researchers Huei-Mei Liu and colleagues tested this idea in a study of Mandarin-speaking babies in Taiwan (Lui et al 2003).

The infants (aged 6 to 12 months) were presented with a background sound — a word repeated over and over again on a loudspeaker. Then researchers switched to another word, one that differed by a single consonant (like switching from “jet” to “set”). If babies recognized the switch, they turned their heads toward the loudspeaker.

Using this measure, the researchers assessed each baby’s speech perception skills in a series of 30 trials. They also recorded and analyzed the infant-directed speech patterns of the baby’s mother. The results? There was a correlation between maternal hyperarticulation and baby speech perception skills:

Mothers who tended to hyperarticulate their vowels had babies who performed better on the speech perception test.

mother talking cheerfully, face-to-face, with attentive baby

This link remained significant even after the researchers controlled for socioeconomic variables, like parental education level and occupation. And other research has documented similar developmental patterns. For example, in a study of toddlers learning to speak English, kids tended to grow bigger vocabularies if their mothers pronounced their vowels with greater clarity (Hartman et al 2017).

Granted, this type of correlational research doesn’t prove that infant-directed speech accelerates language learning. It’s possible that some unidentified factor — like an inherited aptitude for both speaking and perceiving speech sounds — explains the link between maternal speech clarity and infant speech perception.

Moreover, hyperarticulation may be a common feature of infant-directed speech, but it isn’t a cultural universal. In a large study testing adults from more than 180 countries worldwide, people in most societies associated infant-directed speech with the tendency to heighten the contrast between vowels (Hilton et al 2022). But there are places where hyper-articulation isn’t the norm.

For example, in recent studies, English-speaking mothers living Canada didn’t hyperarticulate (McClay et al 2022). And in Japan, mothers actually had a slight tendency to enunciate less clearly when speaking to their infants (Martin et al 2016). So it appears that this aspect of infant-directed speech varies from one language to the next.

Nevertheless, when folks do hyperarticulate, it appears to help listeners “tune into” the right speech sounds.

For instance, in an experiment using playbacks of computer-synthesized speech found that infants under 4 months of age could detect a change in the 2nd syllable of a 3-syllable utterance only when the 2nd syllable was spoken in speech that simulated the high pitch, intensity, and stretched-out pronunciation of baby talk (Karzon 1985).

Another experiment found that 19-month-old toddlers could better recognize a word if an adult spoke with exaggerated, hyperarticulated vowels (Song et al 2010).

And researchers have used a computer model to test if baby talk makes vowel sounds easier to learn. Bart deBoer and Patricia Kuhl presented the computer model with samples of adult-directed and infant-directed speech, then “asked” the model to identify certain key vowel sounds. When the computer model was exposed only to baby talk, its answers were more accurate (deBoer and Kuhl 2003).

Baby talk also makes it easier to learn about words

Infant-directed speech may make it easier to hear the sounds of speech. But how do babies figure out which sounds make up a word?

It’s a problem for any language learner. When adults talk to each other, their rapid-fire, often ungrammatical speech is difficult for a non-native speaker to parse. Words run together. It’s hard to tell where one word ends and another begins.

For instance, consider the phrase “Mama is happy.” When it’s spoken, it sounds like “mamaizhappy.” Where are the boundaries between words? To a person who doesn’t know English, there are many possibilities, like:

“Ma ma izhapp y”

“Mamaiz ha ppy”

“Ma ma izhappy”

So how do listeners find the right word boundaries?

One answer is that the listener hears lots of utterances and eventually their brains notice statistical patterns. She notices, for instance, that the sounds “iz happ” get paired up less often that “hap pee.” So she figures out that “happy” is a word and “izhapp” is not (Saffron et al 1996).

8-month old babies can do this by listening to many examples of adult-directed speech (Saffron et al 1996). Amazingly, experiments indicate that newborns can do it too (Fló et al 2022; Fló et al 2019). And we have reason to think that infant-directed speech makes the task easier. In tests, babies (aged 6-7 months) performed better on word segmentation after listening to infant-directed speech (Thiessen et al 2005).

Interestingly, baby talk seems to help adults, too. When English-speaking adults were presented with playbacks of Mandarin Chinese, they were able to pick out and learn new words more easily when the playbacks featured infant-directed speech (Golinkoff and Alioto 1995).

It seems, then, that infant-directed speech has properties that make it easier for listeners find the boundaries between words (Kemler-Nelson et al 1989; Thiessen et al 2005). But what are these properties?

To some degree, baby talk helps because it’s an attention-grabber.

Numerous studies demonstrate that babies prefer listening to infant-directed speech. And when babies pay more attention, they may be more likely to notice the statistical patterns in speech. Enhanced attention may also help them remember these patterns better (Thiessen et al 2005).

Consistent with this idea, researchers report that infant-directed speech — accompanied by direct eye contact — has a special effect on the brain. When adults communicated face-to-face using infant-directed speech, babies experience enhanced activity in brain regions associated with processing auditory messages. Similar attempts using everyday, adult speech had no such effect (Lloyd-Fox et al 2015).

But infant-directed speech does more than perk a baby’s interest. People using IDS tend to repeat their words, giving babies extra opportunities to listen and learn.

When researchers tracked the development of 121 infants, they found that a mother’s tendency to use repetitive language at 7 months predicted her child’s vocabulary at 24 months (Newman et al 2015).

In addition, IDS is structured in ways that make it objectively easier to discover new words.

Infant-directed speech is slower and marks the spaces between phrases with longer pauses (Kuhl et al 1997). And speakers sometimes make key words stand out.

For example, in English-speaking countries, adults addressing babies tend to alter their typical sentence structure, re-ordering things so that a new or important word comes at the end of an utterance (Fernald and Mazzie 1991; Aslin et al 1996).

People do the same thing when they are teaching adults new, technical terms (Fernald and Mazzie 1991), and it’s a helpful ploy: In one study, 15-month-old infants were better able to recognize new words when these words appeared in the final position of an utterance (Fernald et al 1998).

So can you give your infant a boost by becoming a better baby-talker?

As noted above, that’s hard to prove on the basis of simple correlations between parents and babies. Parents who are really good at IDS might be good at language in general. We can’t rule out the possibility that genetics plays a role in their children’s development.

Still, we can see that infant-directed speech has just the kinds of features you’d expect from a “tutorial” mode of communication — grabbing attention, and making it easier for listeners to notice key features of speech. And we also have the evidence from a “natural” experiment — a commonplace problem that tends to alter parents’ usage of infant-directed speech in the real world.

Depression inhibits the expression of infant-directed speech…and this can interfere with infant learning

In one experiment on 4-month-old baby, Peter Kaplan and his colleagues found that infants could learn to associate a photograph of an unfamiliar, smiling face with an unfamiliar voice speaking baby talk (Kaplan et al 2002). But there was a catch:

When the speaker was a depressed woman, her infant-directed speech was flatter, more monotonic, and the babies failed to show significant learning in the task.

Moreover, subsequent studies have detected effects on babies whose mothers suffer from postpartum depression. For example, when Kaplan and his colleagues tested babies at multiple time points — once at 4 months, and then again at 12 months or beyond — the researchers found that maternal depression at 4 months postpartum predicted poorer learning performance at a later age (Kaplan et al 2012; Kaplan et al 2015).

This decrement in learning performance can’t be entirely chalked up to the lackluster IDS spoken by mothers who were depressed. Depression affects mothers’ behavior in many ways, any of which could have contributed to learning difficulties. But statistical analysis suggests that IDS impairments played a role (Kaplan et al 2015). And given that numerous studies confirm the link between depression and lower-quality IDS (Scheiber et al 2022; Lam-Cassettari et al 2020), this may be a problem that affects many families.

So it seems that the quality of infant-directed speech can have an impact on the way babies learn, and that early exposure matters. Women suffering from postpartum depression have yet another reason to seek treatment and support.

It’s also possible that the absence of expressive baby talk may contribute to speech delays in some toddlers. Studies suggest that some “late talkers”–defined as toddlers who reach the age of 2 years with fewer than 50 words in their vocabularies–haven’t heard as much expressive infant-directed speech as have normally-developing kids.

In particular, researchers have found that mothers of late talkers speak target words with a lower pitch than do mothers of normally-developing kids (D’Odorico and Jacob 2006; Hampson and Nelson 1993).

Of course, we should be careful interpreting such studies. Just because you have a late talker doesn’t mean you failed to provide your baby with the right kind of baby talk!

But it seems there is ample evidence to show that infant-directed speech is helpful. I think we might consider it an important facet of responsive, sensitive parenting during the first two years of life.

More information

Are you feeling depressed? If so, don’t put off self-care. Talk with your doctor about your symptoms, and get social support. To learn about the signs of postpartum depression, see my article, “Postpartum depression symptoms: When is it more than the baby blues?”

For more information about the ways that young children learn speech, see my article, “How to support language development in babies.” In addition, you may be interested in my articles about the effects of television on children’s language skills and baby sign language.

You can read more about the attention-getting and emotional functions of infant-directed speech here.

And check out your baby’s ability to “mind meld.” Read my article, “Talking to babies: How friendly eye contact can help babies tune in — and tune into our brain activity.”

References: How infant-directed speech helps babies learn to talk

Aslin RN, Woodward J, LaMendola N, and Bever TG. (1996). Models of word segmentation in fluent maternal speech to infants. In: J.L. Morgan & K. Demuth (eds.), Signal to Syntax . Mahwah, NJ: LEA (pp. 117-134).

Bryant G A, Liénard P, and Barrett HC. 2012. Recognizing infant-directed speech across distant cultures Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 10: 47-59.

Bryant GA and Barrett HC. 2007. Recognizing intentions in infant-directed speech: evidence for universals: Psychol Sci. 18(8):746-51.

de Boer, B. & Kuhl, P. K. (2003). Investigating the role of infant-directed speech with a computer model, Auditory Research LettersOn-Line (ARLO), 4, 129-134.

D’Odorico L and Jacob V. 2006. Prosodic and lexical aspects of maternal linguistic input to late-talking toddlers. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 41(3):293-311.

Fernald A and Mazzie 1991. Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Developmental Psychology 12(2): 209-221.

Fernald A, Pinto JP, Swingley D, Weinberg A, and McRoberts G. 1998. Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the second year. Psychological Science 9: 228-231.

Fló A, Benjamin L, Palu M, Dehaene-Lambertz G. 2022. Sleeping neonates track transitional probabilities in speech but only retain the first syllable of words. Sci Rep. 12(1):4391.

Fló A, Brusini P, Macagno F, Nespor M, Mehler J, Ferry AL. 2019. Newborns are sensitive to multiple cues for word segmentation in continuous speech. Dev Sci. 22(4):e12802.

Golinkoff RM and Alioto A. 1995. Infant-directed speech facilitates lexical learning in adults hearing Chinese : implications for language acquisition J Child Lang. 22(3):703-26.

Hampson J and Nelson K. 1993.The relation of maternal language to variation in rate and style of language acquisition. J Child Lang. 20(2):313-42.

Hartman KM, Ratner NB, and Newman RS. 2017. Infant-directed speech (IDS) vowel clarity and child language outcomes. J Child Lang. 44(5):1140-1162.

Hilton CB, Moser CJ, Bertolo M, Lee-Rubin H, Amir D, Bainbridge CM, Simson J, Knox D, Glowacki L, Alemu E, Galbarczyk A, Jasienska G, Ross CT, Neff MB, Martin A, Cirelli LK, Trehub SE, Song J, Kim M, Schachner A, Vardy TA, Atkinson QD, Salenius A, Andelin J, Antfolk J, Madhivanan P, Siddaiah A, Placek CD, Salali GD, Keestra S, Singh M, Collins SA, Patton JQ, Scaff C, Stieglitz J, Cutipa SC, Moya C, Sagar RR, Anyawire M, Mabulla A, Wood BM, Krasnow MM, Mehr SA. 2022. Acoustic regularities in infant-directed speech and song across cultures. Nat Hum Behav. 6(11):1545-1556.

Kaplan PS, Danko CM, Kalinka CJ, Cejka AM. 2012. A developmental decline in the learning-promoting effects of infant-directed speech for infants of mothers with chronically elevated symptoms of depression. Infant Behav Dev. 35(3):369-79.

Kaplan PS, Bachorowski J, Smoski MJ, and Hudenko WJ. 2002. Infants of depressed mothers, although competent learners, fail to learn in response to their own mother’ infant-directed speech. Psychological Science 1393) 268-271.

Karzon RG. 1985. Discrimination of Polysyllabic Sequences by One- to Four- Month-Old Infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39(2): 326-42.

Kemler Nelson DG, Hirsh-Pasek K, Jusczyk PW, Cassidy KW. 1989. How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning. J Child Lang. 16(1):55-68.

Kubicek C, Gervain J, Hillairet de Boisferon A, Pascalis O, Lœvenbruck H, and Schwarzer G. 2014. The influence of infant-directed speech on 12-month-olds’ intersensory perception of fluent speech. Infant Behav Dev. 37(4):644-51.

Kuhl PK, Andruski JE, Chistovich IA, Chistovich LA, Kozhevnikova EV, Ryskina VL, Stolyarova EI, Sundberg U, and Lacerda F. 1997. Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science 277(5326):684-6.

Lam-Cassettari C, Kohlhoff J. 2020. Effect of maternal depression on infant-directed speech to prelinguistic infants: Implications for language development. PLoS One. 15(7):e0236787.

Liu HM, Kuhl PK, and Tsao FM. 2003. An association between mothers’ speech clarity and infants’ speech discrimination skills. Dev. Sci. 6 F1–F10.

Lloyd-Fox S, Széplaki-Köllőd B, Yin J, and Csibra G. 2015. Are you talking to me? Neural activations in 6-month-old infants in response to being addressed during natural interactions. Cortex 70:35-48.

Marklund E and Gustavsson L. 2020. The dynamics of vowel hypo-and hyperarticulation in Swedish infant-directed speech to 12-month-olds. Front. Commun. 5:79.

Martin A, Schatz T, Versteegh M, Miyazawa K, Mazuka R, Dupoux E, Cristia A. Mothers speak less clearly to infants than to adults: a comprehensive test of the hyperarticulation hypothesis. Psychol Sci. 26(3):341-7.

Masapollo M, Polka L, Ménard L. 2016. When infants talk, infants listen: pre-babbling infants prefer listening to speech with infant vocal properties. Dev Sci. 19(2):318-28.

McClay EK, Cebioglu S, Broesch T, and Yeung HH. 2022. Rethinking the phonetics of baby-talk: Differences across Canada and Vanuatu in the articulation of mothers’ speech to infants.  Dev Sci. 25(2):e13180.

Newman RS, Rowe ML, Bernstein Ratner N. 2015. Input and uptake at 7 months predicts toddler vocabulary: the role of child-directed speech and infant processing skills in language development. J Child Lang. 24:1-16.

Saffran JR, Aslin RN and Newport EL. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274: 1926-1928.

Scheiber FA, Ryckman KK, Demir-Lira ÖE. 2022. Maternal depressive symptoms and maternal child-directed speech: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 297:194-207.

Song JY, Demuth K, and Morgan J. 2010. Effects of the acoustic properties of infant-directed speech on infant word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 128(1):389-400.

Thiessen ED, Hill EA and Saffran JR. 2005. Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy 1(1): 53-71.

Uther M, and Knoll MA, and Burnham D. 2007. Do you speak E-N-G-L-I-S-H? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech. Speech communication 49: 2-7.

Written content last modified 12/2023. Portions of the text derive from earlier versions of this article, written by the same author.

image of man with baby by istock / Sirikornt

image of mother speaking clearly to infant by JBryson / istock

Related Posts

crossmenu